Linux Journal‘s very first issue featured an interview between
LJ‘s first Publisher, Robert Young (who went on to
co-found Red Hat among other things), and Linus Torvalds (author of the Linux
kernel). After 25 years, we thought it’d be
interesting to get the two of them together again. You can read that first
interview from 1994 here.
Interview: Linus Torvalds and Robert Young
Robert Young: It is a great pleasure to have an excuse to reach out to you. How are
you and your family? Your kids must be through college by now. Nancy
and I and our three daughters are all doing well. Our eldest, Zoe, who
was 11 when Marc and I started Red Hat, is expecting her second
child—meaning I’m a grandparent.
Linus Torvalds: None of my kids are actually done with college yet, although
Patricia (oldest) will graduate this May. And Celeste (youngest) is in
her senior year of high school, so we’ll be empty-nesters in about
All three are doing fine, and I suspect/hope it will be a few years
until the grandparent thing happens.
Bob: When I first interviewed you back in 1994, did you think that you’d
be still maintaining this thing in 2019?
Linus: I think that by 1994 I had already become surprised that my latest
project hadn’t just been another “do something interesting until it
does everything I needed, and then find something else to do” project.
Sure, it was fairly early in the development, but it had already been
something that I had spent a few years on by then, and had already
become something with its own life.
So I guess what I’m trying to say is not that I necessarily expected
to do it for another few decades, but that it had already passed the
bump of becoming something fairly big in my life. I’ve never really
had a long-term plan for Linux, and I have taken things one day at a
time rather than worry about something five or ten years down the
Bob: There is a famous old quote about the danger of achieving your
dreams—your running joke back in the day when asked about your
future goals for Linux was “world domination”. Now that you and
the broader Open Source/Free Software community have achieved that,
Linus: Well, I stopped doing the “world domination” joke long ago, because
it seemed to become less of a joke as time went on. But it always
was a joke, and it wasn’t why I (or any of the other developers)
really did what we did anyway. It was always about just making better
technology and having interesting challenges.
And none of that has really changed on a core level. All the details
have changed—the hardware is very different, the problems we have
are very different, and my role is very different. But the whole “make
it better and have interesting challenges” is all the same.
For example, back in 1994, I was mostly a developer. Sure, I was the
lead maintainer, but while I spent a lot of time merging patches, I
was also mostly writing my own code. These days I seldom write much
code, and the code I write is often pseudo-code or example patches
that I send out in emails to the real developers. I’d hesitate to
call myself a “manager”, because I don’t really do things like yearly
reviews or budgets, etc. (thank God!), but I definitely am more of a
technical lead person than an actual programmer, and that’s been true
for the last many years.
So the truly big-picture thing hasn’t changed, but my role and all the
details obviously look very very different from 1994.
Bob: Where will you and this code base be in another quarter century?
Linus: Well, I’ll be 75 by then, and I doubt I’ll be involved day to day. But
considering that I’ve been doing this for almost 30 years, maybe I’d
still be following the project.
And the good news is that we really do have a pretty solid developer
base, and I’m not worried about “where will Linus be” kind of issues.
Sure, people have been talking about how kernel developers are getting
older for a long time now, but that’s not really because we wouldn’t
be getting any new people, it’s literally because we still have a lot
of people around that have been around for a long time, and still
enjoy doing it.
I used to think that some radical new and exciting OS would come
around and supplant Linux some day (hey, back in 1994 I probably still
thought that maybe Hurd would do it!), but it’s not just that we’ve
been doing this for a long time and are still doing very well, I’ve
also come to realize that making a new operating system is just way
harder than I ever thought. It really takes a lot of effort by a lot
of people, and the strength of Linux—and open source in general, of
course—is very much that you can build on top of the effort of all
those other people.
So unless there is some absolutely enormous shift in the computing
landscape, I think Linux will be doing quite well another quarter
century from now. Not because of any particular detail of the code
itself, but simply fundamentally, because of the development model and
the problem space.
I may not be active at that point, and a lot of the code will have
been updated and replaced, but I think the project will remain.
Bob: Have you and the kernel team been updating the kernel code to your
satisfaction through the years? Is there any need or pressure to
re-write any of the 25-year-old ever-expanding Linux code base?
Perhaps in a more “modern” language than C?
Linus: We’ve gone through many many big rewrites of most of the subsystems
over the years—not all at once, of course—and many pieces of code
end up being things that nobody really wants to modify any more (most
often because they are drivers for ancient hardware that very few
people really use, but that we still support). But one of the
advantages of a big unified source base for the whole kernel has been
that when we need to make some big change, we can do so. There may
be a few out-of-tree drivers, etc., around (both source and binary), but
we’ve always had a policy that if they are out of tree, they don’t
matter for development. So we can make radical changes when necessary.
As to C, nothing better has come around. We’ve updated the kernel
sources for new and improved features (the C language itself has
changed during the years we’ve been doing this), and we’ve added various
extensions on top of C for extra type-checking and runtime
verification and hardening, etc., but on the whole, the language is
recognizably the same except for small details.
And honestly, it doesn’t look likely to change. The kind of languages
people see under active development aren’t for low-level system
programming. They are to make it easier to create user applications
with fancy UIs, etc. They explicitly don’t want to do things a kernel
needs, like low-level manual memory management.
I could imagine that we’d have some “framework” language for
generating drivers or similar, and we internally actually have our own
simplified “language” just for doing configuration, and we do use a
few other languages for the build process, so it’s not like C is the
only language we use. But it’s the bulk of it by far, and it’s what
the “kernel proper” is written in.
Bob: What’s your hardware instrument of choice? Is there a Stradivarius
of Linux (or any) laptops out there? Or tablet or phone?
Linus: My main development machine is a very generic PC workstation. It’s a
franken-machine with different parts cobbled together over the years.
It’s nothing particularly special, and it’s actually been two years since I
made any big changes to it, so it’s not even anything bleeding-edge.
My main requirement at home is actually that it be basically entirely
silent. Outside a couple fans, there are no moving parts (so no
spinning disks anywhere), and the fans are not even running most of
On the road (which is happily not that often), my main requirement
is a good screen and being lightweight. My target weight is 1kg (with
charger), and honestly, I’ve not been able to hit that ideal target,
but right now, the best compromise for me is the XPS13.
Bob: It seems Linux on the desktop’s success was not on the PC desktop but
on the device desktop via Android. What are your thoughts on this?
Linus: Well, the traditional PC is obviously no longer quite the dominant
thing it used to be. Even when you have one (and even when it’s still
running Windows or OS X), lots of people mainly interact with it
through a web browser and a couple random apps. Of course, then
there are the “workstation” users, which is kind of the desktop I was
personally always envisioning. And while still important, it doesn’t
seem to drive the market the way the PC did back when. Powerful
desktop machines seem to be mostly about development or gaming, or
media editing. The “casual” desktop seems to have become more of a
browser thing, and quite often it’s just a tablet or a phone.
Chrome seems to be doing fine in some of that area too, of course. But
yes, in just numbers of people interacting daily with Linux, Android
is obviously the huge bulk of it.
[Note from Bob: In the strict sense of “dominant”, this is probably fair. But
despite the recent fall in total numbers of PCs shipped in the last couple
years, the cumulative growth in the PC market between 1994 and, say, 2014 is
such that even in a slow PC market today, the world is still installing four or
five times as many PCs every year compared to 1994.]
Bob: If you had to fix one thing about the networked world, what would
Linus Torvalds (Image Courtesy of Peter Adams, The Faces of Open
Linus: Nothing technical. But, I absolutely detest modern
“social media”—Twitter, Facebook, Instagram. It’s a disease. It seems to encourage
I think part of it is something that email shares too, and that I’ve
said before: “On the internet, nobody can hear you being subtle”. When
you’re not talking to somebody face to face, and you miss all the
normal social cues, it’s easy to miss humor and sarcasm, but it’s also
very easy to overlook the reaction of the recipient, so you get things
like flame wars, etc., that might not happen as easily with face-to-face
But email still works. You still have to put in the effort to write
it, and there’s generally some actual content (technical or
otherwise). The whole “liking” and “sharing” model is just garbage.
There is no effort and no quality control. In fact, it’s all geared
to the reverse of quality control, with lowest common denominator
targets, and click-bait, and things designed to generate an emotional
response, often one of moral outrage.
Add in anonymity, and it’s just disgusting. When you don’t even put
your real name on your garbage (or the garbage you share or like), it
really doesn’t help.
I’m actually one of those people who thinks that anonymity is
overrated. Some people confuse privacy and anonymity and think they go
hand in hand, and that protecting privacy means that you need to
protect anonymity. I think that’s wrong. Anonymity is important if
you’re a whistle-blower, but if you cannot prove your identity, your
crazy rant on some social-media platform shouldn’t be visible, and you
shouldn’t be able to share it or like it.
Oh well. Rant over. I’m not on any social media (I tried G+ for a
while, because the people on it weren’t the mindless usual stuff, but
it obviously never went anywhere), but it still annoys me.
Bob: This issue of Linux Journal focuses on Kids and Linux. Is there any
advice you’d like to give to young programmers/computer science
Linus: I’m actually the worst person to ask. I knew I was interested in
math and computers since an early age, and I was largely self-taught
until university. And everything I did was fairly self-driven. So I
don’t understand the problems people face when they say “what should I
do?” It’s not where I came from at all.
Bob: The very first time you and I met was at a Digital Equipment
Company (DEC) tradeshow. It was on your very first trip to the US
that Jon “maddog” Hall and DEC financed.
Linus: I think actually that was my second trip to the US. The first was, I believe, a
trip for me to Provo, Utah, to talk with Novell about Linux (for a
project inside Novell that was then to become Caldera).
But yes, the DECUS tradeshow (in New Orleans? Maybe I misremember) was
certainly among my earliest trips to the US.
Bob: I asked how you were going
to catch up with all the emails you missed by the time you returned
to Helsinki. Your answer surprised me, and I’ve been quoting you
ever since. You simply said you would send the backlog of emails
to /dev/null. I expressed shock and asked you, “but what if there
were important emails in your inbox?” You shrugged and replied, “If
it was important, the writer would just send it again.” Possibly
the most liberating piece of advice anyone had ever given me.
Do you still follow that philosophy of email handling?
Linus: It’s still somewhat true, but at the same time, I’ve also changed my
workflow a lot so that travel wouldn’t be as disruptive to my work as
it used to be. So these days I often strive to have people not even
notice when I’m on the road all that much. I will give people a
heads-up if I expect to be without much internet connectivity for more
than a day or two (which still happens in some places of the world—particularly if you’re a scuba diver), but most of the time, I can do
my work from anywhere in the world. And I try (and sometimes fail)
to time my trips so that they’re not in the merge window for me, which is
when I get the most pull requests.
So these days I keep all my email in the cloud, which makes it much
easier to switch between machines, and it means that when I travel and
use my laptop, it’s not nearly as much of a pain as it used to be back
in the days when I downloaded all my email to my local machine.
And it’s not just about my email—the fact that almost all the kernel
development ends up being distributed through git also means that it’s
much less of an issue what machine I am at, and synchronization is
so much easier than it used to be back when I was working with
patches coming in individually through email.
Still, my “if it’s really important, people will re-send” belief stands.
People know that I’m around pretty much 7/365, and if I don’t react to
a pull request in a couple days, it still means that it might have
gotten lost in the chaos that is my email, and people send me a
follow-up email to ping me about it.
But it’s actually much less common than it used to be. Back in 1994, I
wasn’t all that overworked, and being gone a week wasn’t a big deal,
but it got progressively worse during the next few years, to the point
where our old email-and-patches-based workflow really meant that I
would sometimes have to skip patches because I didn’t have the time
for them, knowing that people would re-send.
Those times are all happily long gone. BitKeeper made a big difference
for me, even if not all maintainers liked it (or used it). And now
git means that I don’t get thousands of patches by email any more,
and my inbox doesn’t look as bad as it used to be. So it’s easier to
stay on top of it.
By the way, perhaps even more important than the “If it was important the
writer would just send it again” rule is another rule I’ve had for the
longest time: if I don’t have to reply, I don’t. If I get a piece of
email and my reaction is that somebody else could have handled it, I
will just ignore it. Some busy email people have an automatic reply
saying “sorry, I’ll try to get to your email eventually”. Me, I just
ignore anything where I feel it doesn’t absolutely concern me. I do
that simply because I feel like I can’t afford to encourage people to
email me more.
So I get a lot of email, but I don’t actually answer most of it at
all. In a very real sense, much of my job is to be on top of things
and know what’s going on. So I see a lot of emails, but I don’t usually
write a lot.
Bob: At a talk at the Washington DC Linux user group meeting back in May
1995, that Don Becker organized, you stopped halfway through and
asked the audience if anyone knew the score of the Finland-Sweden
men’s world championship hockey game. As the token Canadian in the
room, I was able to assure you that Finland won that game. On that
topic: Finland’s recent win of the World Junior Championship must
have been fun for you. Or were you cheering for the US?
Linus: Heh. Hockey may be the Finnish national sport (and playing against
Sweden makes it more personal—I speak Swedish as my mother
language, but I’m Finnish when it comes to nationality), but I’m not
a huge sports fan. And moving to the US didn’t mean that I picked up
baseball and football, it just meant that ice hockey lost that “people
around me cared” part too.
Bob: Many of us admire your willingness to call a spade a spade in
public debates on Linux technology decisions. Others, um, dislike
your forthright style of arguing. Do you think you are becoming
more or less diplomatic as time has goes on?
Linus: If anything, I think I have become quieter. I wouldn’t say “more
diplomatic”, but perhaps more self-aware, and I’m trying to be less
Part of it is that people read me a different way from how they used to.
It used to be a more free-wheeling environment, and we were a group of
geeks having fun and playing around. It’s not quite the same
environment any more. It’s not as personal, for one thing—we have
thousands of people involved with development now, and that’s just
counting actual people sending patches, not all the people working
And part of the whole “read me in a different way” is that people take
me seriously in a way they didn’t do back in 1994. And that’s
absolutely not some kind of complaint about how I wasn’t taken
seriously back then—quite the reverse. It’s more me grumbling that
people take me much too seriously now, and I can’t say silly stupid
cr*p any more.
So I’ll still call out people (and particularly companies) for doing
dumb things, but now I have to do it knowing that it’s news, and me
giving some company the finger will be remembered for a decade
afterwards. Whether deserved or not, it might not be worth it.
Bob: Anything else you want to comment on, either publicly or otherwise?
Linus: I’ve never had some “message” that I wanted to spread, so …
About Robert Young and What He’s Been Up to in the Past 25 Years
Graduating from the University of Toronto in 1976 after studying history, Young
took a job selling typewriters. In 1978, he founded his first company and then
spent 15 years in Canada at the helm of two computer-leasing companies. He
sold the second of these to a larger firm who moved him to Connecticut in 1992
to grow their small US subsidiary. Shortly after, the new parent company ran
into financial difficulties, otherwise known as bankruptcy, and Young found
himself working out of his wife’s sewing closet.
Robert Young, LJ‘s First Publisher
Although that event led directly to, in 1993, co-founding Red Hat (NYSE: RHT)
with Marc Ewing, a young North Carolina-based software engineer. Both of them
had fallen in love with free software, now known as open source—Ewing
because he could innovate with software that came with source code and a
license that allowed him to innovate, and Young because he could see how
technology customers could be better served with open technology than the
closed proprietary alternatives the industry offered at the time. Serving as
CEO from founding through Red Hat’s IPO in 1999, he then moved to the role
of Chairman, and the brilliant Matthew Szulik took over as CEO, building the
early Red Hat into a great business. Red Hat is now a member of the S&P 500
Index of the largest US public companies.
In 2000, Young and Ewing co-founded the Center for Public Domain, a non-profit
foundation created to bolster healthy conversation of intellectual property,
patent and copyright law, and the management of the public domain for the
common good. Grant recipients included the Electronic Frontier Foundation and
the Creative Commons.
In 2003, Young purchased the Hamilton Tiger-Cats of the Canadian Football
League, and he currently serves as the league’s Vice-Chairman.
Working with a talented team led by Gart Davis, he helped launch Lulu.com in
2004 as the first online self-publishing services to use print-on-demand
technology to enable a new generation of authors to bring their works directly
to market, avoiding the delays, expense and limited profitability of publishing
through traditional channels. Under the direction of Kathy Hensgen, Lulu
continues to be a leading innovator helping authors bring their works to
In 2012 Young invested in PrecisionHawk, a small drone company led by Ernie
Earon and Christopher Dean. PrecisionHawk, based in Raleigh, has become one of
the leading drone technology companies in the US. He continues to serve as
Chairman, with CEO Michael Chasen.
Since 2016, Young has been involved with Scott Mitchell and a team based in
Toronto, helping organize the Canadian Premier League, a professional soccer
league in Canada. He owns the Hamilton Forge franchise. The league will begin
play this month (April 2019).
His favorite current project is helping his wife Nancy run Raleigh-based
Elizabeth Bradley Design Ltd and its Needlepoint.com store, a leading
needlepoint supplier. Their mission is nothing less than to make the world a
more beautiful place, by growing the community of enthusiastic needlepointers
around the world.
His most beloved pastime is spending time with his growing family. He and his
wife Nancy welcomed their first grandchild a year ago. Young also enjoys
pursuing a bunch of hobbies, always badly. These include fly fishing, kite
boarding, golf, and he collects the occasional antique typewriter—a nod to
his beginnings as a typewriter salesman.
Sidenote: the Faces of Open Source Project
The photo of
Linus in this article is by Peter Adams, a photographer I met a few months ago
when he introduced me to a series he started in 2014 called Faces of Open
Source. On that site, Peter writes, “Despite its wide ranging impact, the
open source revolution remains all but unknown to most people who now, more
than ever before, depend on its survival. This project is an attempt to
change that.” His purpose applies not only to the muggles who rely on open
source, but to the wizards who write their own code and put it to use.
Knowing who created the Open Source world we have now will surely help as
we code up a future that embodies the same good values.—Doc
>> Source Link